|
| |
Name
______________________________ Instructor
___________________________ Lab ____________
|
|
Not Attempted |
Very Poor |
Poor |
Marginal |
Okay |
Good |
Very
Good |
Exceptional |
|
Introduction
(8)
Present background
information relative to the work conducted and help the reader
understand why the work was conducted and the major goals of the work.
|
0 |
1.5 |
3 |
5 |
5.5 |
6.5 |
7 |
8 |
|
Materials and
Methods (10)
Describe materials
used and methods employed in sufficient detail to convey what was done,
so that someone else could repeat the experiment.
|
0 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
Results
(12)
Present experimental
outcomes by incorporating graphs and tables with appropriate explanatory
text.
|
0 |
2.5 |
5 |
7 |
8.5 |
9.5 |
11 |
12 |
|
Discussion
(12)
Interpret and explain
the data and discuss the significance of the results.
|
0 |
2.5 |
5 |
7 |
8.5 |
9.5 |
11 |
12 |
|
Overall Quality
(8)
The paper should be
presented as a neat, professional document, including correct spelling,
grammar, sentence and paragraph structure, and logical flow.
|
0 |
1.5 |
3 |
5 |
5.5 |
6.5 |
7 |
8 |
|
total points = 50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not
Attempted |
Section not
completed. |
|
Very
Poor |
Section attempted
but incomplete or lack of understanding apparent. |
|
Poor |
There is genuine
effort to complete the section but there are omissions, numerous errors,
or major errors. |
|
Marginal |
Section is
completed, but there are numerous or major errors. (D work) |
|
Okay |
Section is completed
at acceptable or average level. Some errors may be present but they are
mostly minor. (C work) |
|
Good |
Section is completed
with several minor errors. (B work) |
|
Very
Good |
Section is completed
with very few minor errors. (A work) |
|
Exceptional |
Section is completed
in a professional manner and is virtually free of errors. (High A work) |
|
Section |
Points |
Detailed basis
for assigning points: |
|
Introduction |
8 |
Include a brief
description of the subject, pertinent background information, the
overall objective and hypothesis, the general procedure, predictions and
supportive rationale. |
|
Materials and Methods |
10 |
Past tense, passive
voice describes the materials and methods used in paragraph, not list,
format. Methods follow a chronological sequence, indicating the
progression of activity in the laboratory. Results should not be
included in this section. |
|
Results |
12 |
Information limited to actual results and do not include
methodological details or discussion of results. Data reported
accurately, concisely and neatly in appropriate figures and
tables. Information in figure legends and table captions explain
what the figure or table shows. Figures and tables presented
appropriately, using correct and consistent formatting. Description of
data in text and text that points to figures and tables. |
|
Discussion |
12 |
Restate and
summarize the report objectives. Include a thorough analysis of the
data that clearly explains what the overall results were and their
significance. Interpret and compare results with results from other
relevant studies. State if the project objectives were accomplished and
whether the hypothesis was supported. |
|
Overall Quality |
8 |
Include an
appropriately formatted “literature cited” section with references cited
appropriately throughout the report. Correct use of spelling and
grammar. Report readable and clear. Title page includes appropriate
information (report title, name, class, and date). |
|